This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped

> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:44:45 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> On 09/14/2012 05:49 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> The notification is like '=record-started,thread-group="i1"'.
> > ?? If this is a thread-group, why does i1 identify a_process_?  Don't
> > you mean "thread group"?
> 
> As matter of fact, this is an inferior, but in MI notification, we call 
> "inferior" as "thread group", IIUC.  So i1 identify an inferior.  Your 
> suggestion "the number assigned by @value{GDBN} to the inferior" is good 
> to me.

But all the other places that describe thread-group= fields talk about
thread groups, so I think we need to do that here for consistency.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]