This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:18 +0800
>
> +@item =record-started,id=@var{id}
> +@item =record-stopped,id=@var{id}
The second line should use "@itemx", otherwise the result will be
ugly.
> +The process record is either started or stoped in process @var{id}.
> +The @var{id} field contains the @value{GDBN} identifier of process.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"contains the @value{GDBN} process ID."
By the way: why is it useful to have the GDB PID part of this
notification? Can you have more than one GDB process at a time that
all communicate on the same wire?
Or did you mean the inferior PID?
Thanks.