This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped


> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:18 +0800
> 
> +@item =record-started,id=@var{id}
> +@item =record-stopped,id=@var{id}

The second line should use "@itemx", otherwise the result will be
ugly.

> +The process record is either started or stoped in process @var{id}.
> +The @var{id} field contains the @value{GDBN} identifier of process.
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"contains the @value{GDBN} process ID."

By the way: why is it useful to have the GDB PID part of this
notification?  Can you have more than one GDB process at a time that
all communicate on the same wire?

Or did you mean the inferior PID?

Thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]