This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Use the string returned by pretty printer for MI varobjs instead of "{...}"
>>>>> "AndrÃ" == Andrà PÃnitz <andre.poenitz@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> writes:
AndrÃ> 'git blame' thinks you added it in September 2009, so gdb 7.0 is
AndrÃ> probably the first one that has it. Calling code "broken" just
AndrÃ> because it handles (also...) "legacy" setups is a bit of a stretch
AndrÃ> in my opinion.
We're only talking about dynamic varobjs here, which the MI user must
explicitly request. Checking a dynamic varobj for "{...}" has always
been wrong, since they were first introduced.
Looking at this for non-dynamic varobjs... well, I wouldn't do that, but
it isn't relevant.
AndrÃ> If you really want to read more into the comment than what was
AndrÃ> actually written, then perhaps a friendly nudge to adapt the
AndrÃ> documentation to existing practice.
As far as I know the documentation is correct.
Tom