This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [SH] regs command


>  What's the technical reason and what do you propose as the alternative?  
> Personally I see no problems with a hierarchical structure of initialisers 
> as long as the hierarchy is well-defined so that people can rely on that.  
> I can give you a name of a complex project that works very well with such 
> an arrangement, and they actually have as many as eight levels.

I would tend to agree with that, I don't see what we would have to lose
by doing so. I even thought that we could also include -nat files as
well in the mix. For instance:
  - all files except the files to follow, in undefined order;
  - all -nat files, in undefined order;
  - all -tdep files, in undefined order.

-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]