This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- From: Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>, "'Stan Shebs'" <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
- Cc: "'gdb-patches at sourceware dot org'" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:55:43 -0400
- Subject: RE: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4F9EBD0D.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Eli Zaretskii
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:09 PM
> To: Stan Shebs
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
> > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:25:49 -0700
> > From: Stan Shebs <email@example.com>
> > It seems logically correct... Did you try Eclipse? This is
> the kind of
> > thing that CDT's MI and console bits can be sensitive to,
> even though
> > it's not supposed to be. :-) If you haven't tried it, doing some
> > breakpoint commands (both from breakpoint window and
> console window)
> > with any recent released Eclipse should be a sufficient sniff test.
> > If Eclipse is good, then this is OK to commit.
> Thanks. No, I didn't try Eclipse, and I don't have it handy. Perhaps
> someone else could.
I actually had to add special code in Eclipse to handle some secondary
prompt weirdness of GDB, so I think it is worth trying your patch
I don't have time right now, but I should this week.
Feel free to ping me in a couple of days if I haven't replied yet.