Re: [PATCH] breakpoint remove fail handle bug fix

[Hui Zhu <hui_zhu at mentor dot com>]

On 04/16/12 17:49, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:16:50 +0200, Hui Zhu wrote:
> > But it didn't handle the issue when the target is remote.
>
> So a similar fix is needed also for gdbserver, isn't it?
>
> One needs to write a testcase for later check-in anyway, testing gdbserver
> without the testcase/testsuite I find too painful.
>
> I still do not see a reason to really handled failed breakpoint removal (or
> insert), gdbserver also can access /proc/PID/mem etc., cannot it?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan

I just try to handle this issue for current issue or other issue about 
breakpoint in the future for example that a remote target cannot delete 
breakpoint when the inferior is running.  But I am OK if you think it is 
not very important.

I suggest we can doc clear about this part for the gdbserver developer.

Thanks,
Hui