This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: xgsa <xgsa at yandex dot ru>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:00:52 +0300
- Subject: Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)
- References: <4ED92C05.9080803@yandex.ru> <m3mxanjiy0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4EF22A4D.80703@yandex.ru> <20111221193630.GA28985@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4EF30389.5010008@yandex.ru> <20111223200951.GA19581@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4EF5D1C5.5010902@yandex.ru> <20120102022153.GA686@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F07177C.5080201@yandex.ru> <m38vkfljq5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F32C009.2050103@yandex.ru> <87pqdma1mo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F412637.2010405@yandex.ru> <4F660CF6.9070008@yandex.ru> <8339953anu.fsf@gnu.org> <4F66DBD0.4000903@yandex.ru> <83vcm01obe.fsf@gnu.org> <4F6CADEF.4080700@yandex.ru>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:07:59 +0200
> From: xgsa <xgsa@yandex.ru>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Sorry for a long response time.
> +would be printed by the @value{GDBN} CLI. Note that if
> +@samp{set print object} setting is set the @emph{actual} (derived) type
> +of the object is set rather than @emph{declared} one.
"setting is set" is not right. I actually don't understand what you
tried to say; if you explain your intent, I will suggest a better
wording.
> +The type of the child. Note that if @samp{set print object} setting is
^^
Two spaces here, please.
> +set the @emph{actual} (derived) type of the object is set rather than
> +@emph{declared} one.
Here you have the same problem as above ("setting is set" and
generally unclear intent).
Thanks.