This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ping: [patch 1/2] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 #5


> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:31:51 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:53:33 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Sorry Jan, but I've completely lost you.  Can we start this discussion
> > from zero again?
> 
> Not sure what to comment on.
> 
> For [patch 2/2] it started with the problem description at:
> 	[patch] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00795.html
> 
> There were tried various (dead-end) ways to fix it so [patch 2/2] is another
> way how to fix the problem.
> 
> Could you be more specific?

Well, I'd prefer not to have to re-read the entire discussion to
review your diff.  But are you saying that you now do think ON_STACK
is the right way to go and I can simply forget about the history?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]