This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)


Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:51:17 +0000
> > From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> >         Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
> > 
> > Jan, Doug, Eli, how do you feel about "possibly inconsistent"?
> > 
> > The option text would become:
> > 
> > "Do not reject possibly inconsistent .gdb_index sections."
> 
> The meaning of that is that the sections being skipped are
> inconsistent within themselves.  If that's really what you meant,
> I'm fine with the change.

The issue is that with older index section the information in the
.gdb_index sections is not consistent with the information that GDB
would generate from the DWARF.  Does that make sense?

Thanks,
Gary

-- 
http://gbenson.net/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]