This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:51:17 +0000
> > From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
> >
> > Jan, Doug, Eli, how do you feel about "possibly inconsistent"?
> >
> > The option text would become:
> >
> > "Do not reject possibly inconsistent .gdb_index sections."
>
> The meaning of that is that the sections being skipped are
> inconsistent within themselves. If that's really what you meant,
> I'm fine with the change.
The issue is that with older index section the information in the
.gdb_index sections is not consistent with the information that GDB
would generate from the DWARF. Does that make sense?
Thanks,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/