This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)


On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:50:55 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
>> + ?--use-old-index-sections\n\
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Do not reject old (broken) .gdb_index sections.\n\
>> +"), stream);
>>
>> s/(broken)/(incomplete)/
>
> FYI I may not have the right interpretation of English words but with
> "incomplete" it may suggest to me that only part of the file will use index
> and part of the file will be processed by a slower non-indexed method.
>
> It should suggest user the GDB functionality will be affected.

The doc patch uses the word "incomplete", so that's why I suggest using it here.
If one wants to find a better word, great, but I think the same word
should be used in both places.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]