This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: AVX and unavailable registers, fix system-gcore.exp
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:49:21 -0800
- Subject: Re: AVX and unavailable registers, fix system-gcore.exp
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hjl.tools@gmail.com designates 10.224.27.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hjl.tools@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=hjl.tools@gmail.com
- References: <4F21A489.2080200@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOp2x+pEJ5fcu5ipdQ=V-WwzQZp3zzZ83nCLiDQmihxMcA@mail.gmail.com> <4F4BD008.1060909@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 06:04 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> 2012-01-26 ?Pedro Alves ?<palves@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?* i387-tdep.c (i387_supply_xsave): If we have an xsave buffer, and
>>> ? ? ? ?the register state is clear, supply explicit zero, instead of
>>> ? ? ? ?marking the register unavailable.
>>
>> This fixes 7.3/7.4 regression:
>>
>> http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13766
>
> Thanks for confirming. ?Since you agree with the patch, I'll check it in in
> a few days unless I hear otherwise. ?I'll post a separate RFC patch proposing
> to remove the NULL REGS handling:
Has this fix been checked in?
Thanks.
H.J.