This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [4/5] implement "info vtable"


On 03/01/2012 05:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Pedro> My only gripe is that we end up with the vtable vs vtbl inconsistency
> Pedro> (set print vtbl).
> 
> Yeah.  I was thinking of renaming 'set print vtbl' (keeping the old name
> as an alias of course).  WDYT?  I think "vtable" is both clearer and
> more commonly used.

I have no problem with vtbl, but if you think vtable is clearer, fine with me.

> Pedro> May be a good idea if the docs are augmented a bit to give an example,
> Pedro> and lightly explain the output.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Pedro> IIUC, "info vtable POINTER" works.  The tests only sees to try
> Pedro> "info vtable OBJ".  Worth adding a test that tries through a pointer?
> 
> Will do.

Thanks.  While at it, it might be worth it to add a test that
tries "info vtable" (no arg), "info vtable foo" with a foo object that doesn't
have a vtable, and perhaps also "info vtable some_scalar".

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]