Re: [RFC] Add support for the Renesas rl78 architecture

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On Thursday 26 January 2012 02:27:04 Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 02:18 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 18:58:00 Kevin Buettner wrote:
> >> +/* Return the register address associated with the register specified
> >> by +   REGNO.  */
> >> +static unsigned long reg_addr (enum sim_rl78_regnum regno)
> >> +{
> >> +  if (sim_rl78_bank0_r0_regnum <= regno && regno <=
> >> sim_rl78_bank0_r7_regnum)
> >> +    return 0xffef8 + (regno - sim_rl78_bank0_r0_regnum);
> > 
> > the if statements look funny because the operators are reversed.  a more
> > 
> > natural (imo) check:
> > 	if (regno  >= sim_rl78_bank0_r0_regnum && regno <=
> > 	sim_rl78_bank0_r7_regnum)
> 
> Funny, I also usually go with Kevin's style.  My rationale is that
> 
>   LOWER_RANGE <= N && N <= UPPER_RANGE
> 
> looks more like the mathematical
> 
>   LOWER_RANGE <= N <= UPPER_RANGE
> 
> and thus reads more naturally to me.

if you guys are used to it, then that's fine.  not like i'm maintaining this 
section of code :).

sim stuff looks OK by me
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.