This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: dje at google dot com, brobecker at adacore dot com, tromey at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:16:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
References: <m3wra5ebvq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111209215319.GA5132@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111210160145.GA7261@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211024742.GN21915@adacore.com> <20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211124213.GO21915@adacore.com> <20111214185650.GA8485@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22QRAqkv9pSJEy5-s33a5D13XAOcaShPU=OVHhQBYap1qg@mail.gmail.com> <20111214194220.GA24281@host2.jankratochvil.net> <E1Rb3lK-0007dC-Ld@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111219104959.GA8788@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:49:59 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: dje@google.com, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:21:46 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > +Known problem of @value{GDBN} itself.  You must specify the @value{GDBN} bug
> > > +report number.
> > 
> > Regarding the "must specify the bug report number": would it make
> > sense to show how to do that, e.g. with an example?
> 
> Is this OK for check-in?

Yes, thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- [commit] [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]
  - From: Doug Evans
- [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]