This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Environment variables passed to inferior by MinGW build (PR 10989)
- From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:53:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Environment variables passed to inferior by MinGW build (PR 10989)
- References: <E1R2jDx-00035B-Fq@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1R5YPa-0007H0-0B@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1R7mEx-0003rs-PZ@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E7FBF9E.20000@earthlink.net> <20110926171511.GJ17681@adacore.com>
- Reply-to: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
On Sep 26 10:15, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > >Ping! Ping! (2 weeks)
> >
> > Seems uncontroversial to me (the previous discussion being about
> > entirely different issues). Let's put it in!
>
> And I think that 2 weeks without comment from the area maintainer
> is reasonable delay for a Global Maintainer to approve or
> self-approve... If it turns out the area maintainer was away
> during that time, and finds some problems, we can always fix or
> revert.
I was on vacation and I'm also not the area maintainer for windows-nat.c.
I commented to http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00347.html
because what Pierre was doing looked wrong to me.
Eli's patch is ok, IMHO, but it's a pity that Pierre never followed up
to http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00351.html since that
means that now setting environment variables works in Mingw, but not in
Cygwin. So, as far as I can see, PR #10989 should not have been closed
yet.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat