Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> I'm currently working towards adding (run control) ptset/itset
Pedro> support to gdb.  Working on instructure still (I can run all-stop on
Pedro> top of a target running in non-stop mode now), and the final syntax
Pedro> will obviously need discussion, but I think we could come up with
Pedro> syntax for this within that framework.

I think it would be good to flesh out the syntax details now.
Maybe you could post your proposal; or even just a link to the earlier
proposal if you plan to follow it.

It would be helpful to the ambiguous linespec work if the basic ptset
code (stuff relating to the data structure itself, not wiring it into
inferior control) were available "early" -- I'm away for a bit, and I
don't know your schedule, so it all may be fine; but I mean sometime in
October.

Tom