This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type


>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:

Yao> Shall we propagate _Complex related tests to each *.exp file, such as
Yao> funcargs.exp/callfuncs.exp/varargs.exp/struct.arg? or keep all _Complex
Yao> tests in a single exp file complex.exp?  I prefer the former one, but I
Yao> am afraid this will break some platforms which don't support _Complex.
Yao> Thoughts?

As long as the change is done cleanly, and there is some mechanism for
avoiding the troublesome code on platforms not supporting _Complex (and
in particular making the rest of the tests in these files continue to
execute on such a platform), then it doesn't matter to me where the
tests end up.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]