This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:29:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.
References: <4D713431.3060907@vmware.com> <201103041928.03380.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4D714472.6050404@vmware.com>

On Friday 04 March 2011 19:58:42, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > It looks irrelevant. 
> 
> It's always relevant to document a fall-through.

Sorry if I wasn't clear, bad choice of words, I guess.
For avoidance of doubt, what I was trying to say was
that it's the same thing whether we document that
this case fallsthrough or whether we a break.

> Agreed.  Extending the same fix to disable_command, and committing.

Thanks.

-- 
Pedro Alves

References:
- [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, enable_command, missing break statement.
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]