This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:24:45 +0000
Subject: Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler
References: <201102071435.20804.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102162125.44378.pedro@codesourcery.com> <m3vd0j3bgr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Wednesday 16 February 2011 21:40:04, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> Pedro> OOC, why the dwarf2_compile_ftype abstraction?  Are you working
> Pedro> on other changes where you'll pass down something else?
> 
> Nope, I just didn't want to make compile_dwarf_to_ax public.
> Maybe it is better to just do that.
> What do you think?

IMO, that'd be better.  Stops everyone else reading the code
from asking that same question in their minds.  :-)

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [unavailable values part 1, 16/17] don't merge almost but not quite adjacent memory ranges to collect
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]