This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch i386, 0/2] skip insns generated by -fstack-protector

From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:36:18 +0800
Subject: Re: [patch i386, 0/2] skip insns generated by -fstack-protector
References: <4D145811.4060805@codesourcery.com> <4D145B02.8030507@codesourcery.com> <m2zkrvedm1.fsf@whitebox.home>

On 12/24/2010 05:15 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:

+	 The change of ESP caused by this instruction is computed a little bit
>  +	 different here, because  we can't get value of offset from
>  +	 instruction itself.  We simulate the execution of this in struction

s/in struction/instruction/

Oops. I'll fix it along with other reviewers' comments together.

--
Yao Qi

References:
- [patch i386, 0/2] skip insns generated by -fstack-protector
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch i386, 0/2] skip insns generated by -fstack-protector
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch i386, 0/2] skip insns generated by -fstack-protector
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]