This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFC] About arm-tdep.c arm_in_function_epilogue_p function
- From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- To: "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <dan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "'Ulrich Weigand'" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:07:05 +0100
- Subject: RE: [RFC] About arm-tdep.c arm_in_function_epilogue_p function
- References: <002701cb83f6$30b394e0$921abea0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20101116000346.GN8573@caradoc.them.org>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:19:29PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >>> Furthermore, found_return isn't used
> >>> anymore in that function.
> >>> Isn't the correct code
> >>> found_stack_adjust = 1;
> I'm pretty sure you're right. I'm not set up at the moment to test
> patches on ARM, but if anyone reading this is, then I'd approve
> that change.
I was able to compile and run the testsuite on an arm linux
machine, processor type armv7l.
Unfortunately, the testsuite seems to never trigger this instruction.
(Checked by adding some specific output if the code triggers,
not found in gdb.log after testsuite completion.)
So I think we should rather leave the decision to Ulrich,
as he seems much more involved in the arm target, no?
Pierre Muller
GDB pascal language maintainer