This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Memory leak fixes
>>>>> "Ali" == Ali Lakhia <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Ali> Please see fixes for memory leaks. My testing for these has been
Ali> limited to just making sure things work for my day-to-day use. Thanks,
In addition to what Joel said, I have a couple notes on the patch itself.q
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2010-09-14 16:59:40.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2010-06-15 14:53:54.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -5462,6 +5462,7 @@
Ali> set_descriptive_type (type, die, cu);
Ali> do_cleanups (back_to);
Ali> + xfree (range_types);
This one seems to be fixed in CVS.
There is a cleanup covering range_types.
Actually, I see this cleanup in 7.1 as well.
How did you find this leak?
Maybe the logic around creating the cleanup is wrong.
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c 2010-09-14 17:03:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/printcmd.c 2010-06-15 14:53:54.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@
Ali> fputs_filtered (">", stream);
Ali> do_cleanups (cleanup_chain);
Ali> + xfree (filename);
This one is also covered by a cleanup.
Ali> diff -ru gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c
Ali> --- gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c 2010-09-14 17:03:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> +++ gdb-7.1/gdb/python/py-type.c 2010-06-14 14:04:28.000000000 -0700
Ali> @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@
Ali> type_print (type_object_to_type (self), "", stb, -1);
Ali> + xfree (thetype);
Ali> thetype = ui_file_xstrdup (stb, &length);
Ali> do_cleanups (old_chain);
I didn't check this one, but if you want to insert a free before a call
to do_cleanups, usually that means you should create a cleanup at the
point of allocation.