This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: fix PR python/11792
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:36:57 -0600
- Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR python/11792
- References: <m3zkwdozop.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3y6boj7y8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83sk1wj6tq.fsf@gnu.org> <m3pqwzj1cf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83pqwzkeyi.fsf@gnu.org> <m3wrr58501.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83zkw0j15r.fsf@gnu.org>
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Tom> I think that would be more confusing. The information needed is
Tom> specifically that emitted by the C++ compiler, following the relevant
Tom> C++ ABI. "For example" makes it sound as though other kinds of run-time
Tom> type information might be used -- but that is not the case.
Eli> Now I'm confused: earlier you told that the current language doesn't
Eli> matter, but now you say that only information emitted by the C++
Eli> compiler will do, which seems a contradiction. What am I missing?
The current language is a gdb setting. It is independent of objects in
the inferior.
Tom