Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t

[Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>]

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:07:55 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I wonder if switching on "-Wc++-compat" wouldn't catch these (at
> least with recent enough gccs) and be more productive than
> switching to a struct.  /me ducks.

I wanted to argue with this great point myself but during my tests (gcc-4.5)
enum unfortunately IS compatible with int even in C++ (tried -Wall/-pedantic
etc.).  I haven't checked the C++ spec.

enum a is not compatible with enum b in C++; while it is compatible in C.
This does not help for the GDB case, though.


Thanks,
Jan