This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t

From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com, pedro at codesourcery dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
References: <20100830070955.GA6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302050.02945.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100830201110.GA17151@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302047.o7UKlPYR005898@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I fear that it's time for another rewrite of linux-nat.c.

For reference sake,
I think such a rewrite wouldn't go far enough.

It's time to remove all the duplicated effort in gdb vs gdbserver.
[E.g. requiring gdbserver for tracepoints?  blech]
My $0.02.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]