This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Patch,ARM] Next pc of sigreturn/rt_sigreturn syscall
Generally looks OK.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:05:55PM -0700, Yao Qi wrote:
> Here is the updated patch, in which:
> 1. Add arm_linux_syscall_next_pc, similar to
> mips_linux_syscall_next_pc. Compute the return address of SWI in both
> ARM mode and Thumb mode.
> 2. Extract some common code from arm_linux_copy_svc.
A valid return address won't be zero, but it's still confusing.
Please do this the way that e.g. mips_linux_get_longjmp_target does;
return 0 or 1, and have a CORE_ADDR * parameter.
> +static int
> +arm_linux_sigreturn_return_addr(struct frame_info *frame,
> + unsigned long svc_number)
Space before "(". Same problem in other places, too.
> +/* When FRAME is at a syscall instruction, return the PC of the next
> + instruction to be executed. */
> +
> +static CORE_ADDR
> +arm_linux_syscall_next_pc (struct frame_info *frame)
> +{
> + CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (frame);
> + CORE_ADDR return_addr = 0;
> + return_addr = arm_linux_sigreturn_return_addr(frame,
> + get_frame_register_unsigned (frame, 7));
Line too long; move the read of r7 to another temporary.
What about non-EABI? We shouldn't wire this up for non-EABI binaries,
because the syscall number won't be in r7.
> @@ -2808,7 +2808,16 @@ thumb_get_next_pc_raw (struct frame_info *frame, CORE_ADDR pc, int insert_bkpt)
> else if ((inst1 & 0xf000) == 0xd000) /* conditional branch */
> {
> unsigned long cond = bits (inst1, 8, 11);
> - if (cond != 0x0f && condition_true (cond, status)) /* 0x0f = SWI */
> + if (cond == 0x0f) /* 0x0f = SWI */
Why did you remove the condition_true check?
> + {
> + struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep;
> + tdep = gdbarch_tdep (get_frame_arch (frame));
You can just use gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery