This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: add a few index entries (Re: Static tracepoints support)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:11:01 +0300
- Subject: Re: add a few index entries (Re: Static tracepoints support)
- References: <201006251931.57860.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83tyoqcc8i.fsf@gnu.org> <201006281326.39820.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201007011515.11282.pedro@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:15:10 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> On Monday 28 June 2010 13:26:38, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > > +@cindex set static tracepoint
> > >
> > > This index entry would be much more efficient if it did not start with
> > > "set". For example,
> > >
> > > @cindex static tracepoint, setting
> >
> > Agreed. I see the same could be done to set fast tracepoint. I'll
> > see about auditing that and others after this patch is in.
>
> Can't say I see that much consistency, but, reading the generated
> index, these appear to me to increase usefulness. Okay?
Yes, thanks.