This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Add -s option to source command.
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:49:41 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
>
> --- NEWS 1 Apr 2010 14:11:22 -0000 1.367
> +++ NEWS 8 Apr 2010 22:40:59 -0000
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>
> *** Changes since GDB 7.1
>
> +* The source command now accepts a -s option to force searching for the
> + script in the source search path even if the script name specifies
> + a directory.
> +
This part is okay.
> --- doc/gdb.texinfo 8 Apr 2010 21:08:40 -0000 1.697
> +++ doc/gdb.texinfo 8 Apr 2010 22:41:00 -0000
This part is okay, with a couple of comments:
> @@ -19373,7 +19373,7 @@ using the @code{script-extension} settin
> @table @code
> @kindex source
> @cindex execute commands from a file
> -@item source [@code{-v}] @var{filename}
> +@item source [@code{-s}] [@code{-v}] @var{filename}
Please remove the @code markup from the switches, it is redundant
(because this is "@table @code" already, so every @item gets the @code
markup by default). Yes, the old text was also wrong.
> +If @code{-s} is specified, then @value{GDBN} searches for @var{filename}
> +on the search path even if @var{filename} specifies a directory.
I presume it searches for the basename of @var{filename}, right? If
so, please tell that explicitly. Also, the comments in the
implementation say that symlinks are not resolved; if that's how we
want this to work, it should also be mentioned, I think.
Thanks.