This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:37:34 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
References: <20100323205655.GA12124@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m339zpk0gg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20100324200943.GA12225@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100324201825.GA31992@caradoc.them.org> <20100324203252.GA17319@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> complain that the two files do not match: 7=.gnu.version 5=.dynstr

This seems to undermine the assumption that sections in the .debug file
are in the same order as in the main file.

Jan> Not sure how this algorithm could be improved to cope with it.

Can we stably sort the sections by name, using the initial index as a
secondary key?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch] Fix separate-debug with non-unique section names (PR 11409)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]