This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [2 of 3]

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>, "jakob at virtutech dot com" <jakob at virtutech dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:36:06 -0800
Subject: Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [2 of 3]
References: <00cf01ca265a$d4110dc0$7c332940$@com> <4B292EC9.1010303@vmware.com> <83d42e7klb.fsf@gnu.org> <200912162345.37121.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <837hsl73up.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:45:37 +0300
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,
 jakob@virtutech.com,
 gdb-patches@sourceware.org

I am mildly concerned that the important high-level functionality is
only documented as option to specific commands, and as this functionality
is exercised and documentation is improved, we'll end up with information
scattered over N commands.


Ah, that's a valid concern.  How about if we do both: document the
"--reverse" option with each command _and_ add a section with an
overview of this feature?

But let's wait and see -- right now, there's not so much information
there.

Agreed.

So the patch is clear to go in, as far as I'm concerned.

Checked in, after private email from Volodya.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]