This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:51:16AM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote:On 11/20/2009 02:09 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I am generally opposed to committing known regressions. If there are supporting patches we need to get in first, let's do that; if there are tests we decide to break, let's XFAIL or KFAIL them. That's the only way we can make the testsuite more useful.
Sami has a follow-on patch that he could submit to fix all of these tests (they all pass on archer-keiths-expr-cumulative). Perhaps it would be acceptable for Sami to submit that patchset when/if this patch is accepted? [His patches rely on this patchset.]
If it applies on top of this, could he post it now? Then we can treat them as a unit for review and testing purposes.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |