This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, pedro at codesourcery dot com, uweigand at de dot ibm dot com
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:36:25 -0500
Subject: Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
References: <20091115173429.GB23483@caradoc.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911151833510.28152@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <200911152148.nAFLmYPK018249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:48:34PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Isn't it a bit ridiculous that glibc, which is a GNU project, makes
> the life of GDB, another GNU project, so difficult?

Yes.  However, even if we could get some help from the libc developers
- signs so far, very grim - this mess has now been deployed for years :-(

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]