This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:38:19 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <email@example.com>
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > should continue stepping. For x86_64 glibc, the magic name is
> > "__longjmp". Otherwise, we do a frame check as before.
> Nowadays you may need to handle ____longjmp_chk for glibc 2.11 as well.
> Because distribution compilers may or may not enable _FORTIFY_SOURCE by
> default, I suppose in principle the tests should be run explicitly with
> different settings.
Isn't it a bit ridiculous that glibc, which is a GNU project, makes
the life of GDB, another GNU project, so difficult?