This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error
The callers are very lazy, they like call a function directly. :)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:04, Tom Tromey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu <email@example.com> writes:
>>> It add a new argument "catch" to do_record_message. ?If catch is true,
>>> it will call "record_message" with catch errors. ?If not, it will call
>>> "record_message" directly.
> I don't like this much either. ?It is trivial for callers that want to
> catch errors to catch them. ?They can use TRY_CATCH or catch_errors(...,
> Callers that don't want to catch errors should just call
> do_record_message directly. ?This is both for type safety and also
> because such calls are plain old C, and should therefore look like it.