This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods
- From: Jonas Maebe <jonas dot maebe at elis dot ugent dot be>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods
- References: <7B6EF4DA-76C8-4D9C-8B9F-94153EF1C4E1@elis.ugent.be> <email@example.com> <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <19C107AA-5271-4C23-A6D2-AFF75BBAC4E4@elis.ugent.be> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <5AA3BCA9-1ECF-446E-8B49-3132F0E470FB@elis.ugent.be> <20090930000225.GA10338@adacore.com> <8F3B6095-4766-432D-ABB5-AB4DAA2D5572@elis.ugent.be> <email@example.com> <20090930173230.GG10338@adacore.com>
On 30 Sep 2009, at 19:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:
Jonas> Later on, Tom clarified that he thought that the gdb and gcc
Jonas> of dwarf2.h should actually be merged into a single copy,
but that I
Jonas> shouldn't worry about this since the divergence started
Jonas> patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00099.html
I've merged these now.
I think the usual approach for such merged files is that GCC is the
Confirmed. It's written plain as day in the header. The sticky part
is that Jonas does NOT have copyright assignment on file for GCC, as
far as I can tell...
I've pinged my dwarf2.h thrice on the gcc-patches list in the mean
time (always inline, because it doesn't contain any lines >= 80
chars), the last time mentioning that I now also have a copyright
assignment on file for GCC. I haven received so much as an
Here's the last ping I did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01788.html
(it's only from Friday, but given my past experiences, I don't
expect it suddenly to be picked up after getting buried under a couple
days extra mail).
I don't know what else to do.