This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: New ARI regression Fri Oct 23 01:57:01 UTC 2009
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>, Pierre Muller <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:50:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: New ARI regression Fri Oct 23 01:57:01 UTC 2009
- References: <20091023015701.GA26378@sourceware.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4AE1D314.email@example.com>
On Friday 23 October 2009 17:00:20, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Pierre Muller wrote:
> > Is there a valid reason to use LITTLE_ENDIAN rather than
> > BFD_LITTLE_ENDIAN as required by the ARI rule:
> > LITTLE ENDIAN?3???????Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN, instead use
> > BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
> > See:
> > http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ari/
> > Pierre Muller
> > as ARI "maintainer"
> Thanks Pierre. ?Checked in as obvious.
No, this is wrong. BYTE_ORDER isn't available on all hosts, and
even if it did, its values surely don't match enum bfd_endian...