This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

New ARI regression Fri Oct 23 01:57:01 UTC 2009


Is there a valid reason to use LITTLE_ENDIAN rather than
BFD_LITTLE_ENDIAN as required by the ARI rule:

LITTLE ENDIAN	3	Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN, instead use
BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
See:
http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ari/

Pierre Muller
as ARI "maintainer"


> > gdb/record.c:1958: regression: LITTLE_ENDIAN: Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN,
instead use BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
> gdb/record.c:1958:  return (BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> > gdb/record.c:1966: regression: LITTLE_ENDIAN: Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN,
instead use BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
> gdb/record.c:1966:  return (BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> > gdb/record.c:1974: regression: LITTLE_ENDIAN: Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN,
instead use BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
> gdb/record.c:1974:  return (BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN)




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]