This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] doc for "info record"
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "pedro at codesourcery dot com" <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:48:38 +0800
- Subject: Re: [RFA] doc for "info record"
- References: <4ADF2846.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4AE0B37D.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:33, Michael Snyder <email@example.com> wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:27:02 -0700
>>> From: Michael Snyder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Look ok to you Eli?
>> Yes, with a few comments:
>>> +Show various statistics about the state of process record and its
>>> +in-memory execution log buffer, including:
>>> +@table @code
>> @table, and @code on top of that, is inappropriate for what you want
>> here: a list of p[lain-text items. ?Please use @itemize @bullet or
>> @itemize @minus. ?Note that with @itemize, you need to have each @item
>> alone on its line, and the text should be on the following line, like
>> ?Whether in record mode or replay mode.
>>> +@item whether in record mode or replay mode.
>>> +@item Lowest recorded instruction number (counting from when the current
>>> execution log started recording instructions).
>> Please capitalize the first word of each @item consistently.
>>> +@item Max number of instructions that may be contained in the execution
>> ? ? ? ? ^^^
>> No need to use abbreviations in a manual.
>> Okay with these corrections.
> Done, and committed.