This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error


It looks like you might be waiting for input from someone, or for
approval? I confess that I'm still completely confused as to what
the problem is and how you're resolving it.  I don't want to be
the one slowing you down, so if Michael is happy, I'm happy.  But
if you'd like me to take a look, can you try to explain the issue
in a different way?

For instance, I asked:

> In other words: If an error occurs during recording, somehow
> the inferior "runs away", meaning runs until completion?
> Do we lose the process record?

I was mentioning this as being the current behavior, which
presumably is wrong.  Am I correct?

I also asked:

> Based on the transcript of the session *with* the patch you propose,
> it looks like GDB is now just stuck on that instruction that it does
> not know how to record. Is that really progress?

I am now refering to the situation *AFTER* your patch is applied.
I couldn't understand the answer to sent or how it was relevant to
my question.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]