This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:26:43 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref
References: <20090809213710.GA14354@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m3ljlr77ma.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090810221157.GA3109@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <8ac60eac0908101523v5be259e7xd76df35a919b9a01@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:23:01 +0200, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jan
> Kratochvil<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The binutils go32-target patches are now also checked-in:
> >        http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/threads.html#00155
> 
> AFAICT, above patch will not fix the GDB assert.
> Ah, you mean this one:
>   http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00154.html

I did mean the URL reference as for the whole patchset of [0/4]...[4/4].
You are right the GDB-specific patch was that [3/4] one.


Thanks for no OBJF_KEEPBFD,
Jan

References:
- [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Assertion for a regression by gdb_bfd_unref
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]