This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Pedro Alves <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I guess "info inferiors" would show all the checkpointed forks for a
>> given inferior?
> That's one option, sure. ?I haven't given much attention to user
> interface details of checkpoints. ?Another idea we be to just flag that
> there are checkpoints available, and then the user can do the usual
> "info checkpoints" to see them. ?This avoids having a too crowded
> "info inferiors" output.
Other targets (e.g. simulators) may have checkpoints that have nothing
to do with multiple inferiors, so fwiw I think they should be kept