This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Process record and replay checked in to main trunk
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, pedro at codesourcery dot com, marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com, msnyder at vmware dot com, bauerman at br dot ibm dot com, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 01:02:33 +0800
- Subject: Re: Process record and replay checked in to main trunk
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 17:15, Eli Zaretskii <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:59:30 +0800
>> From: Hui Zhu <email@example.com>
>> Cc: Pedro Alves <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Marc Khouzam <email@example.com>,
>> ? ? ? Michael Snyder <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Thiago Jung Bauermann <email@example.com>, Eli Zaretskii <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>> ? ? ? Mark Kettenis <email@example.com>
>> Process record and replay make gdb can record inferior execute log and
>> replay (include reverse debug).
>> Now, it support I386-Linux single-thread single-inferior native debug.
>> It was checked in today.
>> Thanks for evey people that spent time on process record. ?Precord
>> can't be a part of gdb without your help. ?Thank you very much. ?:)
> Thanks. ?I clarified and improved the section in the manual with the
> patch below (committed).
That is great. Thanks.
> What I think is still missing from the manual is a few sentences that
> would explain when this target is useful. ?Can you provide such ``war
> stories''? ?I will then add them to the manual.
Which sentences? ``war stories''?
Do you mean is internal doc?