This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI solib notification
- From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, nickrob at snap dot net dot nz
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:08:37 +0300
- Subject: Re: MI solib notification
- References: <200901310010.46738.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <uskmyc90b.fsf@gnu.org> <20090201182917.GF4597@caradoc.them.org>
On Sunday 01 February 2009 21:29:18 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > That'd be okay as well, although I don't really understand why it is
> > better than my suggestion.
>
> It's not a big difference; I find it more natural to have the output
> all grouped together and looking similar to GDB's expected output.
I'd prefer this approach to, because that's how the rest of MI docs do it.
But -- who to I force a break inside @item ?
- Volodya