This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC][python] Fixes and improvements to gdb.Value.
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:09:07 -0200
>
> In a nutshell, my answer is "no, I don't think it should". :-)
Then perhaps having an index entry "gdb.history" is not important,
either?
> If @var{number} is negative, then @value{GDBN} will take its absolute value
> and count backward from the last element (i.e., the most recent element) to
> find the value to return. If @var{number} is zero, then @value{GDBN} will
> return the most recent element. If the element specified by @value{number}
> doesn't exist in the value history, a @code{RuntimeError} exception will be
> raised.
>
> What do you think?
Sounds good.
> 2009-01-03 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.texinfo (Basic Python): Document gdb.history.
Thanks, I'm happy now.