This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:09:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
References: <200810180210.16346.pedro@codesourcery.com> <48F93A22.7070409@vmware.com> <200810180408.42297.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 04:08:42AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I think asm ("nop") like below is your best bet.  Is there any assembler
> that doesn't understand "nop"?

Compare with GCC's configure script, which has a list of nops for
various architectures.  Or compare with asm-source.exp and its
per-arch fragments.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]