This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
bsd-uthread, properly clean up after ourselves
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:56:19 +0100
- Subject: bsd-uthread, properly clean up after ourselves
Hi,
I've noticed a couple of issues with the bsd-thread target regarding
tear down, while working on making the core target always register
at least the main thread.
First, there's a typo here:
void
bsd_uthread_solib_loaded (struct so_list *so)
{
const char **names = bsd_uthread_solib_names;
for (names = bsd_uthread_solib_names; *names; names++)
{
if (strncmp (so->so_original_name, *names, strlen (*names)) == 0)
{
solib_read_symbols (so, so->from_tty);
if (bsd_uthread_activate (so->objfile))
{
bsd_uthread_solib_name == so->so_original_name;
^^
return;
}
}
}
}
Which makes this, a nop:
void
bsd_uthread_solib_unloaded (struct so_list *so)
{
if (!bsd_uthread_solib_name)
return;
if (strcmp (so->so_original_name, bsd_uthread_solib_name) == 0)
bsd_uthread_deactivate ();
}
Second, if popping this target, and we haven't cleaned up the
shared library list yet, we'd leave bsd_uthread_active still set.
That doesn't look conceptually right to me.
The attached patch addresses both issues, but fixing the typo,
and by moving the globals cleanup to target_close. unpush_target
ends up calling bsd_uthread_close, so unloading -lc_r or -lpthread
will still work (or ratter, will start working, due to the typo
being fixed).
OK?
--
Pedro Alves
2008-08-11 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* bsd-uthread.c (bsd_uthread_close): New.
(bsd_uthread_deactivate): Don't cleanup here, just unpush the target.
(bsd_uthread_solib_loaded): Fix typo.
(bsd_uthread_target): Register bsd_uthread_close.
---
gdb/bsd-uthread.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/bsd-uthread.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/bsd-uthread.c 2008-08-11 13:23:16.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/bsd-uthread.c 2008-08-11 13:23:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -192,18 +192,12 @@ bsd_uthread_activate (struct objfile *ob
return 1;
}
-/* Deactivate the thread stratum implemented by this module. */
+/* Cleanup due to deactivation. */
static void
-bsd_uthread_deactivate (void)
+bsd_uthread_close (int quitting)
{
- /* Skip if the thread stratum has already been deactivated. */
- if (!bsd_uthread_active)
- return;
-
bsd_uthread_active = 0;
- unpush_target (bsd_uthread_ops_hack);
-
bsd_uthread_thread_run_addr = 0;
bsd_uthread_thread_list_addr = 0;
bsd_uthread_thread_state_offset = 0;
@@ -212,6 +206,18 @@ bsd_uthread_deactivate (void)
bsd_uthread_solib_name = NULL;
}
+/* Deactivate the thread stratum implemented by this module. */
+
+static void
+bsd_uthread_deactivate (void)
+{
+ /* Skip if the thread stratum has already been deactivated. */
+ if (!bsd_uthread_active)
+ return;
+
+ unpush_target (bsd_uthread_ops_hack);
+}
+
void
bsd_uthread_inferior_created (struct target_ops *ops, int from_tty)
{
@@ -239,7 +245,7 @@ bsd_uthread_solib_loaded (struct so_list
if (bsd_uthread_activate (so->objfile))
{
- bsd_uthread_solib_name == so->so_original_name;
+ bsd_uthread_solib_name = so->so_original_name;
return;
}
}
@@ -492,6 +498,7 @@ bsd_uthread_target (void)
t->to_shortname = "bsd-uthreads";
t->to_longname = "BSD user-level threads";
t->to_doc = "BSD user-level threads";
+ t->to_close = bsd_uthread_close;
t->to_mourn_inferior = bsd_uthread_mourn_inferior;
t->to_fetch_registers = bsd_uthread_fetch_registers;
t->to_store_registers = bsd_uthread_store_registers;