This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: arm_addr_bits_remove
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at linux-mips dot org>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:41:32 -0500
- Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove
- References: <479752C8.8030201@portugalmail.pt> <8f2776cb0801231121r3fe9aea0q6f3c3d6887fcb251@mail.gmail.com> <20080123192842.GA22477@caradoc.them.org> <8f2776cb0801231311o19c31781h8a4663c405bcd22b@mail.gmail.com> <479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt> <8f2776cb0801232227n64502d4akef4642b051e77772@mail.gmail.com> <4798871B.4080207@codesourcery.com> <20080124133844.GA15771@caradoc.them.org> <20080124214849.GF3979@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0802041006230.23236@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:15:57AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> For the record -- to ever hit this case on MIPS you would have to run the
> test suite in the 32-bit kernel mode, so IRIX certainly does not apply
> here. One of the embedded targets might fit, e.g. using newlib and the
> GNU sim. Still this would be a bug if it mattered these days as proper
> sign-extension of addresses is meant to be done for MIPS now.
Really? This is for removing low bits, not high bits - I'd be more
worried about MIPS16.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery