Re: [patch][sh] mac.l insn endian issue

[Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>]

Jim Blandy wrote:
> I don't think long long is guaranteed to be 64 bits long, but this is
> certainly better than what's there now.  (I gather that STMicro has a
> blanket assignment.)  So this looks okay to me.  Should Antony add
> himself to the write-after-approval list?

It uses the same types the original implementation did, so I don't think 
it's any worse. I suspect that much of the simulator implementation 
would fall apart if the size of char, short, int and long long were not 
as expected.

ST does indeed have all the proper assignments. I do not know what is 
the proper thing to do with the write-after-approval list. Antony does 
not have write access, hence why I was posting it on his behalf. This 
stuff is usually handled by myself and Denis Pilat, both on the list.

If this is not a problem then I shall go ahead and check in the patch 
(minus the internal ST bug number).

Andrew