This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Patch] -var-evaluate-expression NAME [FORMAT]
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: "Marc Khouzam" <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- Cc: drow at false dot org, nickrob at snap dot net dot nz, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:30:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch] -var-evaluate-expression NAME [FORMAT]
- References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290E7D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:23:19 -0500
> From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
> Cc: "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> > The grammar for MI commands says options always come first. They're
> > optional, anyway, so how about -var-evaluate-expression [-f
> > @var{format-spec}] @var{name}?
>
> Yes, I like that better too.
> I have updated the code, the tests and the doc to follow this format.
> Maybe Eli wants to re-approve?
If you need my reapproval, you've got it. Thanks.
> I rebuilt (not the doc) and ran regression.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Why not?