This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [8/9] multiple locations

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:38:12 -0500
Subject: Re: [8/9] multiple locations
References: <18233.20228.172834.464875@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200711131105.10906.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:05:10AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > 
> > Does the (p) add anything useful to the user?  The manual says:
> > 
> >       An optional `(p)' suffix marks pending breakpoints
> > 
> > Is that not clear from the word PENDING?
> 
> No, because if you set breakpoint in a shared library, and that library
> is unloaded, you have some number in 'address' field, but the breakpoint won't
> actually fire, and the "(p)" indicates that fact.

Can we just change it back to <PENDING> by discarding the address?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [8/9] multiple locations
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- Re: [8/9] multiple locations
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: [8/9] multiple locations
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]